Togo’s National Cancer Control Plan, titled Plan Cancer Togo 2022-2025, is intended to reduce cancer-related mortality through coordinated prevention and comprehensive cancer care, aligned with the national non-communicable disease strategy and National Health Development Plan.It responds to a rising cancer burden, estimated at 5,208 new cases and 3,468 deaths in 2020, with breast and cervical cancers prominent among women and prostate cancer among men.
The strategy is organised around five interlinked areas: prevention and early detection; quality of care; surveillance, research, monitoring and evaluation; leadership, governance and intersectoral action; and partnerships and resource mobilisation.The wider situation analysis identifies prevention and early detection, human resources, care, financial mobilisation, surveillance and research, and governance as core intervention domains.
Implementation combines health-system strengthening, decentralised delivery, multisectoral action and international collaboration. The plan builds on a national cancer-control programme established in 2009, a National Cancer Institute created in 2015, cancer-registration activities initiated in 2017, and recommendations from the International Atomic Energy Agency imPACT review.The health system operates through six health regions and 39 districts, providing a decentralised structure for integrating cancer priorities into regional and district plans.
Delivery is intended to involve ministries responsible for health, agriculture, education, youth and sport, quality-control bodies, community and professional actors, civil-society organisations, cancer associations, private-sector organisations, economic operators and development partners.The World Health Organization, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Agency for Research on Cancer and other international partners are identified as potential technical supporters.
Monitoring and evaluation use existing National Health Development Plan mechanisms, including committee sessions, joint missions with technical and financial partners, periodic evaluations, surveys, studies and supervision.Annual and mid-term health-sector reviews are intended to assess performance and obstacles, with mid-term and final plan evaluations.Indicators cover trained personnel, public knowledge, communication-material availability, screening campaigns, vaccination coverage, cancer cases confirmed in District Health Information Software 2, cancer-registry timeliness, studies completed, supervision, legal measures, multisectoral actions, partnerships and annual financing reports.
Financially, the plan seeks a dedicated cancer-control budget line, subsidised or free cancer care, innovative domestic financing, strengthened partner support, and allocation of tobacco and alcohol taxes to cancer control.No total costed budget, funding allocation, financing target or quantified funding gap is specified in the supplied material.
The plan establishes a monitoring, evaluation and accountability architecture combining cancer surveillance, routine reporting, supervision, periodic reviews and formal evaluations. It aims to strengthen cancer case registration, operational, basic and clinical research, and monitoring and evaluation at all levels of the health system.
Governance arrangements assign central coordination and implementation follow-up to the multisectoral cancer consultation framework, the National Programme for the Control of Chronic Diseases and the Division for Non-Communicable Disease Surveillance. Regional management teams are expected to apply the plan, incorporate cancer priorities into regional plans and take corrective measures, while district teams integrate cervical-cancer interventions into operational plans, promote intersectoral collaboration and complete indicators.
Monitoring draws on existing National Health Development Plan mechanisms, including statutory or extraordinary monitoring-committee sessions, joint missions with technical and financial partners, supervision, surveys, studies and periodic evaluations. Annual and mid-term health-sector reviews are intended to assess performance and obstacles; the plan provides for both mid-term and final evaluations.Semi-annual reviews of interventions and actors across the health-service pyramid are also planned.
The logical framework contains process, outcome and impact indicators. Process indicators measure implementation of activities, whereas outcome and impact indicators assess progress towards objectives. Reporting sources include training reports, surveys, evaluation reports, routine activity reports, vaccination reports, registry reports, mission reports, meeting minutes and annual financial reports.Reporting frequency is generally annual, although population-knowledge surveys are planned every two years and certain reporting and supervision activities range from monthly to six-monthly.
Accountability also covers annual review of laws, decrees and orders, new legal and regulatory texts, multisectoral meetings and actions, partnerships formed, supervisory activities, interventions evaluated and annual financial reporting.Key evidence gaps include the absence of recent national cancer data, recent non-communicable disease risk-factor studies and research on occupational exposures such as asbestos, wood dust, pesticides, herbicides and tannins.
Financing and resource mobilisation are strategic priorities, but the supplied material does not provide a quantified total budget, detailed costing table, expenditure allocation, financing target, funding gap or economic assumptions for the cancer plan.
The financing context includes the absence of a dedicated cancer budget, limited domestic resource-mobilisation capacity, dependence on external assistance, insufficient chronic-disease funding, low universal health coverage and financial barriers to care.The situation analysis also identifies insufficient financial-resource mobilisation strategies and limited stakeholder prioritisation of cancer as constraints to implementation.
Health regions and districts each have a budget line in the general State budget, but no cancer-specific allocation is supplied.Economic context data report gross domestic product per capita of 404,674 West African CFA francs in 2018, alongside annual gross domestic product growth ranging from 4.4 to 5.4 between 2015 and 2019.These figures are contextual indicators rather than a cancer-plan financing commitment.